ming movie reviews

in about 100 words or less

Eyes Wide Shut (1999)

UK 159m, Colour
Director: Stanley Kubrick; Cast: Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Sydney Pollack, Marie Richardson, Todd Field

eyes-wide-shutA psycho-sexual thriller dealing with jealousy and obsession, Eyes Wide Shut provides an intimate window into the lives of a husband and wife whose relationship becomes increasingly strained when she reveals a dream about an affair that she never acted upon. Strangely distraught, the husband goes to great lengths looking for an encounter of his own. Beautifully lit and photographed, Kubrick also builds a great deal of suspense, and plenty of paranoia, despite the fact that much of the story’s promise is left largely unfulfilled (Klaus Ming May 2014).


5 comments on “Eyes Wide Shut (1999)

  1. Anthony Lee Collins

    I remember a lot of debate at the time about whether Kubrick had actually finished the film before his death. I have no idea, obviously, but I do think the music (from the director of 2001!) was very disappointing (and annoying). Other than that, I admire it on a lot of levels but it doesn’t totally grab me. It may be that I’m resistant to stories which are driven by jealousy (I’m not that crazy about Othello, either, though I do like the Welles movie).

    • Klaus

      I don’t disagree, very repetitive and not very interesting score. After a couple of days thinking about this one, I’ve also come to the conclusion that I’m not a fan of this film on the basis that none of the characters are particularly likeable – which is probably an unfair basis for judging a film…but there it is.

  2. CMrok93

    As usual with Kubrick, it’s pretty weird. But that’s what works so well for it. Respectable swan song, I’d say. Good review Klaus.

  3. Chris, a librarian

    The original source. Arthur Schnitzler’s book Dream Story, is an interesting read for a comparison to the film. The movie is pretty close to the book in a lot of ways, though the original story is set in 1900 Vienna.

    • Klaus

      Sounds like it would be more interesting as a period piece.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on 05/10/2014 by in 1001+, 1990s, All and tagged .
%d bloggers like this: